You call this "discipline," the rest of us call it torture...

[lunadelcorvo]

Christian discipline drawing criticism even from Christians

The two cases discussed are here and here. There is another excellent Salon article on the phenomenon here.

---

When the hell are we going to deal with this crap? When are we going to realize that parents usually don't dream up this stuff on their own? In no way do I exonerate a parent who can beat their child to death without knowing it's wrong, but the Pearls and others with similar rhetoric are to blame as well. "Doesn't advocate abuse?" Seriously? In whose dictionary is advising a parent to use plumbing line to strike their child (as young as 6-12 months!) NOT abuse?

What really bothers me is that this stuff is not broadly pursued with any real vigor because it hides behind a bogus screen of religious freedom. Individuals who go to far are sometimes (but not always) convicted of what it really is: abuse, murder, torture. But the broad problem gets a minor mention at the bottom of the article, with words like 'suspect,' 'may be influenced.' Why? Why is this not a center stage issue?

I'll tell you why. First, imagine a Muslim family that did this in the US; beat a child to death in the name of religious discipline. What a shitstorm that would be! Or a Wicca parent, using a switch to instill their religious values (supposedly just as well protected)? We look the other way on this stuff because as a society, we are scared to confront the Christian gloss on it, and it perpetrators hide behind that gloss, knowing it protects them. I call bullshit!!!!!!

Comments

[primitivepeople.livejournal.com]

I'm sorry if my words seem so condemnatory.

Don't worry, I wasn't offended. I'm often shocked and saddened by how utterly stupid some Christians are, and it's often enough to make me tempted to give up. God I can cope with, but a lot of his followers are nutjobs.

Thankfully, here in the UK, more extreme Christian fundamentalism is rare, and a lot of churches are fairly moderate.

I fully understand your issues, as I've had to work out a hell of lot of this stuff myself - and a certain Raven Moon has seen a lot of my agonised travails over this.

I think a lot of this hinges on how far you go in taking the Bible literally. Most hardcore evangelicals/conservatives/fundies adopt an "all or nothing" approach to the Bible - or at least claim that they do - despite the fact that it was written thousands of years ago in a violent and largely anarchic culture. The view that it's either all true, or all false, is very widespread, and I held this for a long time, until I realised that this is crazy, and the Bible is full of stuff that, true or not, just isn't relevant to 21st century life. For starters, modern concepts of love, romance, marriage and relationships simply didn't exist when it was written, and trying to apply bits of the Bible literally to this is extremely problematic.

I have a lot of serious problems with most of the Old Testament and some lesser problems with the New, and I'm not sure I'll ever deal with these. But thankfully I recently moved house, giving me an excuse to dump the fundie-nutjob church I was in and move to a much more sensible and rather more liberal one. It did me a lot of good.

[lucretiasheart.livejournal.com]

Wow. Why aren't you a spokesperson for all Christians?? We need to hear more from people like yourself. You give me serious hope.

And, yes, the UK doesn't have the crazy fundies we suffer from over here. Sigh! America started as a place to escape religious persecution only to become one of the least liberal places religiously. Double sigh... =^\

[primitivepeople.livejournal.com]

Well, I've occasionally thought about becoming a minister of some sort, but I don't think I'd be taken all that seriously, unfortunately - because I'm not "evangelical" enough. A lot of Christians are threatened by people like me, who stick with it but ask lots of awkward questions.