[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

The New York Times’ yearslong investigation which revealed Cesar Chavez spent decades sexually abusing underage girls and women marks a devastating fall from grace for the fabled leader.

Chavez was long considered a civil rights icon, the face of farmworkers’ rights, a hero at the very center of the labor movement.

He is also woven deeply into the fabric of the nation. In 2014, President Barack Obama designated March 31, Chavez’s birthday, as Cesar Chavez Day, which is also recognized as a holiday in several states. 

There are also any number of streets, schools, parks, statues, murals, and libraries that honor Chavez and his legacy. There is even a Cesar Chavez National Monument in Keene, California.

A marker in honor of César Chavez along the Points of Light: Volunteer Pathway on Thursday, March 19, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Allison Robbert)
A marker in honor of César Chavez along the Points of Light: Volunteer Pathway on March 19 in Washington.

It was immediately clear from the Times’ story that Chavez’s actions could not be waved away as mere rumors or unsourced accusations. Times reporters interviewed over 60 people, and several women who were abused by Chavez as young teenagers came forward to tell their stories. 

Because of that, Chavez supporters—which, let’s be honest, includes much of the left—were forced to immediately grapple with what to do about all of the very visible, public honoring of Chavez.

The organizations most closely tied to Chavez and his legacy issued statements right away.

Teresa Romero, president of the United Farm Workers union founded by Chavez, said the allegations were “difficult to hear,” but that the UFW “[does] not condone the actions” of the labor icon.

“It’s wrong,” Romero said. 

The UFW Foundation immediately canceled all Cesar Chavez Day activities and called Chavez’s actions “indefensible.” 

The Cesar Chavez Foundation called the revelations “shocking, incredibly disappointing, and deeply painful” and told the survivors of his abuse: “We believe you. We honor your courage, and we are very sorry for the harm you have carried in the shadows for so long.”

Democratic lawmakers and blue cities acted swiftly to begin the process of undoing the myriad ways that Chavez is honored. 

The same day the news hit, Lansing, Michigan, canceled a dinner celebrating the legacy of Chavez, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, canceled its annual celebration as well. 

New Mexico Sen. Ben Ray Lujan called for Chavez’s name to be removed from every public site, and Denver has already removed a sign and bust from a park named after Chavez.

A student looks toward a plywood box covering a statue of César Chavez at California State University, Fresno in Fresno, Calif., Wednesday, March 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez)
A student looks toward a plywood box covering a statue of César Chavez at California State University, Fresno on March 18.

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs said that the governor’s office would not recognize Cesar Chavez Day this year, while the Phoenix City Council has set a vote for next week to rename all the buildings and streets named for Chavez. 

House Democratic Women’s Caucus Chair Teresa Leger Fernández issued a statement saying she was heartbroken and deeply disturbed, but that the caucus would always stand with survivors. 

Arizona Democratic Rep. Adelita S. Grijalva  said she was “deeply troubled” and then addressed the survivors of Chavez’s abuse directly. 

“We hear you, we believe you, and we admire the immense courage it takes to speak out,” she said.

Grijlava also acknowledged the pain and complexity of this shocking revelation about a once-revered figure.

“I know that there is a profound sense of grief in our community today that may bring mixed emotions,” she said. “The betrayal of trust by a leader who had such a significant impact on our community is difficult to comprehend. It is ok to feel angry, shocked, heartbroken, saddened, confused, and dismayed—all at the same time.”

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott immediately said the state would no longer celebrate Cesar Chavez Day, but also used the opportunity to bash progressives, because why pass up a cheap shot when you’re Greg Abbott?

“Reports of the horrific and widely acknowledged sexual assault allegations against Cesar Chavez rightfully dismantle the myth of this progressive hero and undermine the narrative that elevated Chavez as a figure worthy of official state celebration.”

Texas puts how the left and the right treat the past in stark relief. A replica of Robert E. Lee’s estate is still in the Texas park that bears his name. The GOP fought to keep Confederate statues for “historical preservation and education.”

This isn’t to say Texas shouldn’t remove Chavez’s name and likenesses from anywhere in the state—they are absolutely right to do so, as is the case everywhere else. But the state’s ongoing refusal to step back from glorifying treason in defense of slavery is pretty bleak. 

California, the state arguably most entwined with Chavez’s legacy and the first to make his birthday a holiday, has a lot of work ahead to unwind everything honoring Chavez—but they are already making a start. 

A sanitation worker picks up trash next to a mural of César Chavez in Bakersfield, Calif., Thursday, March 19, 2026. (AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez)
A sanitation worker picks up trash next to a mural of César Chavez in Bakersfield, California on March 19.

Lawmakers are planning to pass a bill renaming the state holiday to Farmworkers Day. San Jose officials canceled the city’s planned celebration and announced they would find a way to honor farmworkers without celebrating those who caused “such profound harm to the community.” 

And Alex Padilla, the first Latino elected to represent California in the Senate, said Chavez’s actions were abhorrent and that there must be “zero tolerance for abuse, exploitation, and the silencing of victims, no matter who is involved.”

Overall, Democrats accepted the revelations and moved to cancel all gestures honoring Chavez while wrestling with heartbreak. Contrast that with how Republicans deal with sexual abuse allegations on their side of the aisle. 

When The New York Times published a detailed investigation into allegations that Brett Kavanaugh, then a Supreme Court nominee, had sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford, with two additional women, Deborah Ramirez and Jule Swetnick, coming forward with their own allegations, the Republican reaction was … different. 

The GOP circled the wagons, worked to discredit the victims, and rewarded Kavanaugh with a lifetime seat on the Supreme Court. 

President Donald Trump later mocked Ford at a rally, implied she was part of a conspiracy to bring Kavanaugh down, and bemoaned just how hard this was on Kavanaugh. 

“They destroy people, these are really evil people,” Trump whined.

And speaking of Trump: This is a man a jury found liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll, a verdict he continues to fight while begging the Supreme Court to make it go away. There is currently a whole-of-government effort to stop any revelations about Trump in the Epstein files from ever seeing the light of day. 

Here’s how Fox News sneeringly characterized statements from Golden State lawmakers in the wake of the revelations about Chavez: “California Democrats distance themselves from famed pro-union activist after bombshell report.”

But Democrats aren’t distancing themselves. They are taking accountability—a thing that the GOP simply doesn’t believe in. It’s about grappling with something that hurts, but realizing that Chavez hurt people far more. 

It’s hard, and it’s sad, and it’s what has to be done. 

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Democrats responded to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer's attempts to run cover for Attorney General Pam Bondi's mishandling of the Epstein files by walking out of a closed-door meeting Wednesday when it became clear she was dodging a subpoena. 

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., leans in to hear a question as he speaks to reporters after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not appear for a deposition as part of the panel's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and those connected to him, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
GOP Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, who serves as House Oversight Committee chair, speaks with reporters on Jan. 14.

On Thursday, Rep. Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, flanked by fellow committee Democrats, accused the Department of Justice of continuing to cover up the Epstein investigation. She singled out Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for trying to evade a legally binding subpoena requiring them to testify under oath.

“So let me be clear to Pam Bondi: You are required by the law to appear in front of Congress, and if you do not, we will hold you in contempt and we will pursue justice,” she said. “This is not optional. Let us be clear about that.”

Stansbury continued, “The Department of Justice has not complied with even half of the required files that they need to release to the Congress. And now we have Pam Bondi saying in front of the committee yesterday that she will not commit to comply with a congressional subpoena. So we are putting the U.S. Department of Justice on notice.” 


Related | Pam Bondi moves to make DOJ attorneys even less accountable


Her remarks came after Comer attempted to obfuscate the facts by accusing Democrats of having "someone secretly tape recording" the meeting, basing his claims on the accuracy of reporting on the matter.

Bondi’s reticence to appear publicly after last month’s humiliating display in front of Congress only raises more questions about what she’s trying to avoid—and the legal consequences she may be hoping to elude.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

From “Because I Got High” to First Amendment rights, Afroman’s music is now making waves in the court of law. 

On Wednesday, the comedic rapper won a defamation lawsuit brought against him by seven law enforcement officers. An Adams County, Ohio, jury ruled that his use of footage from the August 2022 raid of his home was not a violation of their privacy. 

“We did it, America!” Afroman, born Joseph Edgar Foreman, exclaimed in a video posted to Instagram Wednesday. Behind the rapper was an ecstatic crowd of supporters as he celebrated in an American-flag suit. “We did it! Freedom of speech! Right on!” 

In 2022, police executed a search warrant of Afroman’s home to look for evidence for drug trafficking and kidnapping, but ultimately, they came out empty-handed—aside from allegedly lifting some money. 

While the rapper wasn’t at home at the time of the raid, his wife and children were present. And thanks to their filming and home security footage, there was plenty of ammunition for the 51-year-old to process his emotions through music videos.

“Are therе any kidnapping victims inside my suit pockets? / You crooked cops need to stop it,” Afroman sang in “Will You Help Me Repair My Door” as security footage played of the officers throwing around his belongings. “Any kidnapping victims inside my CDs? / The Adams County Sheriff's Department, you can get these.”

Another track, “Lemon Pound Cake,” mocked a moment in which a sheriff’s deputy seemed to eye a cake sitting on the rapper’s kitchen counter. All of these officers were heavily armed and in protective vests as they searched the home. 

“The Adams County Sheriff kicked down my door / Then I heard the glass break / They found no kidnapping victims / Just some lemon pound cake,” he belts out in the track. 

Despite hurting some feelings and making for some laughs, the court of law ultimately ruled that Afroman’s right to make music about what happened to him was, in fact, protected by the First Amendment. 

Outside of rapping about marijuana in some legendary songs, the musician has no clear ties to kidnapping or drug trafficking. The only legal troubles he has publicly faced is a 2015 incident in which he allegedly punched a fan in the face on stage.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries dismantled the right-wing talking point that Democrats are refusing to fund the Department of Homeland Security, making it clear who’s actually responsible for TSA agents going without paychecks and travelers experiencing chaos. 

“We should be able to get this done today,” Jeffries told a reporter who asked why there has been little movement on funding the government. 

The top Democrat called out the man who actually has the power to put an end to the stalemate: House Speaker Mike Johnson.

“All Speaker Johnson needs to do is bring the legislation to the floor that will pay TSA agents and reopen the parts of the Department of Homeland Security that have nothing to do with ICE and have nothing to do with Trump’s extreme and violent mass deportation machine,” Jeffries said.

Jeffries is clear on why Republicans won’t budge.

“It's because they don't support getting ICE under control,” he said. “This is their policy. It's Trump's policy. It's Stephen Miller's policy to use taxpayer dollars to brutalize or kill American citizens, as we've seen with the cold-blooded killings of Renee Nicole Goode and Alex Pretti. And the American people want that to stop.” 

Democrats have been straightforward about how to keep the government running: fund essential services while demanding more accountability for the unpopular and cruel Department of Homeland Security. It is a path Republicans have repeatedly refused to take.


Related | DHS immigration spending makes it clear: The cruelty is the point


[ SECRET POST #7013 ]

March 19th, 2026 06:55 pm
case: (Default)
[personal profile] case posting in [community profile] fandomsecrets

⌈ Secret Post #7013 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



More! )


Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1001.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

A coalition of eight states, led by their Democratic attorneys general, is suing to stop Nexstar Media Group from acquiring Tegna. 

Nexstar owns more than 200 TV stations while Tegna owns 64, so a merging of the companies would reach more than 54% of households, exceeding current Federal Communications Commission limits on station ownership.

FILE - Host Jimmy Kimmel speaks during the Oscars at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles, March 10, 2024. (AP Photo/Chris Pizzello, File)
Late night host Jimmy Kimmel was forced off air by the Trump administration—and Nexstar complied.

Nexstar was one of two major TV station groups, along with Sinclair, that pulled comedian Jimmy Kimmel off the air last year to appease President Donald Trump.

The states—California, New York, Colorado, Illinois, Oregon, North Carolina, Virginia, and Connecticut—allege that the merger violates existing antitrust laws prohibiting consolidation that would create a monopoly.

“If approved, this multibillion-dollar deal would combine the nation’s largest and third-largest television-station conglomerates, creating a behemoth covering 80% of U.S. television households,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement. “When broadcast media is owned by a handful of companies, we get fewer voices, less competition, and communities lose the critical check on power that local journalism delivers.”

New York State Attorney General Letitia James cited similar concerns in her announcement of the suit, noting that the merger would also lead to increased consumer costs because Nexstar could charge more for cable access to its programming via monopoly power.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr, who was installed by Trump—who Carr recently praised as an “alpha”—previously voiced support for the merger. He even suggested that he would instruct the FCC to waive its rules on media ownership to allow Nexstar to proceed.

x

FCC Chair Brendan Carr calls Trump "the alpha in every single room and every single place all across the world"

FactPost (@factpostnews.bsky.social) 2026-03-18T15:55:18.034625007Z

When Nexstar demonstrated its willingness to follow through on the Trump administration’s threats against dissenting voices by silencing Kimmel, Carr praised the company for it at the time.

“I want to thank Nexstar for doing the right thing,” he said

Carr claimed that shutting down Kimmel, who has long been a thorn in Trump’s side, was in “the public interest.”

FILE - President-elect Donald Trump talks with Brendan Carr before the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2024 in Boca Chica, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Pool via AP, File)
FCC Chair speaks with President Donald Trump.

The lawsuit was praised by the media advocacy group Free Press.

“Donald Trump’s efforts to consolidate major media in the hands of his political cronies is a perfect example of why Congress prohibited TV broadcasters from getting this big in the first place,” Free Press General Counsel and Vice President of Policy Matt Wood. 

He added, “This deal would create a massive broadcast conglomerate willing to put the political agenda of Donald Trump over the needs of the communities local television serves.”

And in January, a coalition of 28 labor unions and civil rights groups—including the Communications Workers of America, the Writers Guild, and the NAACP—wrote to the FCC to oppose the merger.

The Nexstar consolidation effort mirrors other media industry activity—like GOP donor David Ellison’s takeover of CBS parent Paramount and proposed acquisition of CNN parent Warner Discovery—that’s shifting media ownership into pro-Trump hands.

Trump and other Republicans have made clear their open hostility toward free expression and speech. Owning broadcast networks is just another front in the right’s war on the First Amendment.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Intelligence officials endured a second day of shellacking during a House Select Intelligence Committee hearing on global threats Thursday, with Democrats highlighting the inconsistencies in President Donald Trump's justifications for his war in Iran.

Rep. Joaquin Castro of Texas questioned National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe on why Israel hasn’t listened to Trump’s warnings about attacking Iran’s oil infrastructure.

“I don't know the answer to that,” Gabbard said. I don’t know Israel’s position on that.”

“I wouldn't speak for Israel,” Ratcliffe added.

“What do you guys know? We're at war. What do you guys know?” Castro pressed.

Things escalated when Rep. Jimmy Gomez of California challenged Gabbard’s equivocations regarding her prior assessment that Iran wasn’t rebuilding a nuclear program before Trump launched his war.

“It's an easy answer,” Gomez said. “You either stand by what you said last year or not.”  

“It is a serious question that requires the totality of the information available—” Gabbard began. 

“When President Trump was asked about your testimony, he said you were wrong,” Gomez interrupted. “Were you lying or not?”

“I stand by the intelligence community's complete assessment,” Gabbard replied.

Meanwhile, Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado focused on Iran’s leadership, asking about Mojtaba Khamenei—who is considered a far more militant successor to his father, former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.


Related | Tulsi Gabbard can’t handle Democrats’ questions on Iran


“And we don't know if the son will continue his father's religious ban on developing nuclear weapons, is that correct?” Crow asked.

“It's unknown at this time,” Gabbard said, noting that recent reports of Khamenei being wounded have further muddied the situation.

“So we're less certain of the positions of Iranian leadership and their intentions than we were 60 days ago, correct?” Crow asked. 

“That's an accurate assessment,” Gabbard replied. 

And Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee raised another concern: If Trump had been briefed that Iran might move to close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation, why didn’t he do more to prepare?

All I can say is that the president ultimately is responsible for making the decisions based on the totality of information and intelligence that he has available to him,” Gabbard said. 

“The intelligence that he has available to him,” Cohen replied. “That's a scary thought.” 

A scary thought indeed.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Kristi Noem, the now-former secretary of homeland security, recently had the dubious honor of being the first member of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet to get fired, though she did score the consolation prize of becoming the “special envoy for the Shield of the Americas,” whatever that is.

But Noem shouldn’t shoulder all of the blame for the $220 million Department of Homeland Security ad campaign at the center of her downfall. While her pals did rake in the dollars from that nonsense, some Trump-connected companies did as well. 

Over $22 million, according to Politico. And honestly, we should have known that folks connected to Trump would get paid—they always do. 

There’s no question that a $220 million ad campaign that was ostensibly about DHS but was really about taking pictures of Noem on horsies was always a bad idea. Not because it was an absurd, corrupt waste of money, but because it highlighted Noem. 

That was made all the worse when she shifted some of the blame to Trump, saying he signed off on the staggering sum, as she tried to wriggle out from under Senate questions about the contract. 

For his part, inevitably, Trump threw Noem to the wolves, saying he’d never signed onto anything of the sort.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem appears for an oversight hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 3, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Then-Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, shown on March 3.

Now, we’ll never know if that’s true. The government is now operated in secret, with huge contracts being handed out like candy to favored vendors. The normal process of transparent, competitive contracting is gone.

What we do know, though, is that two companies run by political operatives connected to Trump were some of those favored vendors for this ad campaign, per Politico. 

Safe America Media, run by two operatives connected to a company that handled media buys during Trump’s 2024 campaign, got $15.2 million to work on the $220 million contract. That company was incorporated just days before getting those millions, and it won a no-bid contract totalling $143 million.

It isn’t clear how that $143 million contract award netted Safe America only $15.2 million in the end, but it isn’t the only Trump-connected slimeball company here.

People Who Think—the dumbest name imaginable—also got at least $7.7 million as part of a commission on the $220 million ad campaign. Why on earth the government would be paying for such a thing is a mystery. That group was founded by Jay Connaughton, who worked on Trump’s 2016 campaign. Neat how that works.

This fiasco was hung around Noem’s neck, with much initial reporting focused on the Noem-tied  Strategy Group’s role in the campaign. However, other fly-by-night conservative grifters were also making bank. And why shouldn’t that include some Trump connections?

DHS is awash in cash, which always meant it would be awash in corruption. But that isn’t just Noem’s fault. Trump is ultimately responsible for creating the culture of corruption and grift that animates his administration, and everyone he knows is definitely going to get paid—with your tax dollars, natch.

fatalfae: (Default)
[personal profile] fatalfae posting in [community profile] su_herald
EVE: I mean, I understand. You're running the whole circus now, a lot of pressure, especially with your hands-on policy. No pun intended. I'm sure you could use a release.

ANGEL: No releasing, just bathing. That's what one does after bashing open a demonic pinata full of rancid Tabasco. What do you want, Eve?

EVE: You stood me up. We had a 7:30, Angel, a meeting.

ANGEL: Oh. Right. Uh... I'll get my pants.

~~Life of the Party~~



[Drabbles & Short Fiction]


[Chaptered Fiction]


[Images, Audio & Video]


[Reviews & Recaps]


[Fandom Discussions]



Submit a link to be included in the newsletter!

Join the editor team :)


glowingfish: (Default)
[personal profile] glowingfish
A lot going on, so this might seem pretty random:

You probably know this old sitcom plot/trope, even if you can't think of a specific example:
Elementary school kid is in a play or has a ballet or piano recital or some other young person activity. Workaholic father (and yes, usually the male parent) promises to come, but suddenly something comes up with work so kid is crushed, looking out at the audience and searching for an absent parent.

Did this ever really happen? Was this something kids actually worried about or would have been harmful?

For context, I was born in 1979, and I might have been one of the last cohorts of free-range children. I wasn't part of any organized activities, and I didn't have any lessons, as a child. We played in the woods or dug holes or played indoors with action figures. Also, my parents divorced when I was 5. So my prime elementary school years, 6-8, were spent happily inventing and playing in my own world, sometimes by myself, sometimes with neighborhood kids. As much as there were big events at school, I would have seen them as a chore or a bother.

I guess the reason that this is important is that as a child, I formed my sense of self around my imagination, and around spontaneous games. But I guess for some children, that was formed around a more formal social world, and having parental/social confirmation was important?

Obviously, of course, this is a plot point, but is it/was it close to reality for some children?
[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Things got crazy awkward during an Oval Office meeting between President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, when a reporter asked Trump why he hadn’t warned Japan before attacking Iran.

“One thing, you don't want to signal too much,” Trump said. “Who knows better about surprise than Japan, okay? Hey, why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?”

Trump appeared to register the room’s abrupt discomfort with his remark.

“Okay? Right?” he continued. “He's asking me, ‘Do you believe in surprise’—I think much more so than us. And we had to surprise them, and we did.”

Takaichi is in the U.S. seeking to smooth over relations with Trump, who has criticized Japan for not helping him clean up the fallout from the war he started with Iran. 

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Everybody knows that Trump’s irrational hatred of wind farms is driving our energy policy these days. But after court after court told Trump he can’t just arbitrarily block these almost-completed projects, the administration has a new plan: Using almost $1 billion of your tax dollars to permanently block those wind farms.

The administration is kicking around the absolutely unhinged notion of paying TotalEnergies, which is building two wind farms in New York and North Carolina, $928 million, the amount TotalEnergies paid for the leases to build the farms. Then, the administration gets to cancel the leases. No leases, no wind farms. 

Cartoon by Mike Luckovich
“Nothing but air” by Mike Luckovich

Oh, also, TotalEnergies would have to agree to invest in a natural gas infrastructure in Texas. So, the Trump administration is going to waste nearly $1 billion, and while they’re at it, force TotalEnergies to switch from providing clean, unlimited wind power to yet another return to limited, pollution-y fossil fuels. 

Isn’t it great to have our energy future in the hands of one man who thinks that wind farms “drive whales crazy,” that they are “killing our economy,” and that the wind is the most expensive form of energy. If someone cornered you at a party saying this sort of thing, you’d edge away, leaving them to find another unwilling victim to listen to their conspiracy nonsense. But you can’t edge away from the president, unfortunately.

The New York wind farm was expected to generate enough clean energy for almost 1 million homes. And this is at a time when Trump has declared that we have a national energy emergency. But somehow, that emergency can only be solved by fossil fuels instead of the nefarious, terrifying wind. 

Of course, natural gas isn’t the only fossil fuel the administration is pushing on the nation. It is also forcing coal companies to keep aging coal plants running, even when that costs consumers more. And coal even has a mascot! Making energy more expensive seems like a pretty weird way to solve an energy emergency, but what do we know?

Trump also delegated his authority under the Defense Production Act to Energy Secretary Chris Wright, who just invoked it to compel the restarting of an oil pipeline in California, despite state officials keeping it offline and opposing any restart. What does a pipeline have to do with national defense?

UNITED STATES - MAY 7: Energy Secretary Chris Wright testifies during the House Appropriations Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Subcommittee hearing on Department of Energy's budget, in Rayburn building on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images)
Energy Secretary Chris Wright

Well, Trump’s war, of course, as Wright explained: “Today, more than 60% of the oil refined in California comes from overseas, with a significant share traveling through the Strait of Hormuz—presenting serious national security threats” and this will “strengthen America’s oil supply and restore a pipeline system vital to our national security and defense, ensuring that West Coast military installations have the reliable energy critical to military readiness.”

This is quite the stretch: Trump wrecked access to oil via the Strait of Hormuz, which in turn makes California a national security risk because it gets some oil via that route, so we need a pipeline for our national security.

Wright is also obscuring how much of California’s oil comes through the Strait by waving around that 60% number and not breaking it down. The actual amount of California oil that comes through the Strait is much closer to 30%.

Meanwhile, in the real world, Trump’s fetish for war and oil has led to a catastrophic increase in gas prices, and his relentless attacks on wind farms are making the future prospects of the entire wind power industry pretty dim. 

And while the United States is being battered by increased fossil fuel costs, other countries have been smart enough to invest in clean energy and may be able to weather Trump’s war better.

But for now, enjoy your higher gas prices and your tax dollars paying to kill a clean energy project that would make your energy prices cheaper. It’s a lose-lose.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

A poll released on Wednesday reveals that clear majorities of Americans have an extremely negative view of President Donald Trump, another sign of the sour mood of voters ahead of this year’s midterm elections. Republicans could be in for an electoral disaster.

According to the poll from YouGov, majorities of Americans say the following terms describe Trump “a lot”: arrogant (65%), opportunistic (57%), reckless (56%), dishonest (54%), corrupt (54%), hypocritical (53%), and divisive (51%).

By contrast, only 38% say “strong leader” describes Trump a lot, and just 35% say the same about “intelligent.” A paltry 22% of Americans strongly identify Trump as “likable,” while 54% say that term does “not at all” describe him.



Despite America’s low opinions of Trump, Republicans are determined to hold on to his “MAGA” brand. The National Republican Congressional Committee recently announced that it is rebranding its program to support GOP candidates in swing districts as “the MAGA Majority.”

While Trump is not directly on the ballot in this year’s midterms, it will be the first time since 2024 that the whole nation’s voters can register their feelings about him and the Republican Party. That’s bad news for Republicans.

Republicans have been failing in special elections all over the country and lost significant races in New Jersey and Virginia. At the same time, Democrats have been turning out to support progressive candidates like Illinois Senate candidate and current Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton, who has made opposition to Trump a centerpiece of her campaign.

Trump’s several escalating crises have soured voters on the Republican brand, and the blame falls on Trump and his congressional enablers.

Flames rise from an oil storage facility south of the capital Tehran as strikes hit the city during the U.S.–Israel military campaign, Iran, Saturday, March 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)
Flames rise from an oil storage facility south of Tehran, Iran, amid U.S. and Israeli strikes on March 7.

The Trump administration has been unable to explain to the public why the nation is waging war against Iran, and the conflict is causing fuel costs to surge. It is unlikely that many voters will be soothed by rhetoric like Vice President JD Vance’s spin that the skyrocketing gas prices are merely a “blip.”

There is also widespread anger about violent immigration raids, censorious attacks on free speech and LGBTQ+ rights, as well as the administration’s open corruption and promotion of racism.

Rather than work to soothe Americans’ economic concerns, Trump has instead focused his attention on matters like the construction of his obscene White House ballroom and his obsession with taking over Cuba, Greenland, and Venezuela.

Congressional Republicans have recently focused their legislative attention on bills like the SAVE America Act, designed to suppress the vote and give legitimacy to Trump’s long-debunked conspiracies of election fraud.

That bill is unlikely to pass, and there doesn’t seem to be anything on the horizon that will prevent a major electoral disaster for Republicans and their “arrogant” leader.

midnight_heavenly_bodies: (jon001)
[personal profile] midnight_heavenly_bodies posting in [community profile] addme_fandom
Name: C.K. or Chester
Age group: mid-to-late 30s -- 36 specifically.
Country: USA
Subscription/Access Policy: 18+ only. No Harry Potter fans. No antis. No Chappell Roan stans (I see how y'all are treating my man and I don't like it.)  For a more in-depth 'about me', follow this link.

Main Fandoms: Culture Club (the greatest band of the '80s! I write fic for them and sometimes cross-post deep dives from my website on them.)
Other Fandoms: Linkin Park, WWE, Smoky Mountain Wrestling
Fannish Interests: Fanfiction mostly, and doing deep dives on my many OCs.
OTPs and Ships: Culture Club: Boy George/Jon Moss, Roy Hay/Mikey Craig; Linkin Park: Bennoda [Chester Bennington/Mike Shinoda]; Wrestling: Hartbreak (Bret Hart/Shawn Michaels), Shawnter (Shawn Michaels/Hunter Hearst-Helmsley), Candy (Cody Rhodes/Randy Orton); and then I have a lot of ships in my fandoms involving OCs. 

Favourite Movies: The Room (lol), Pretty in Pink, Borat, Major League, man there's so many and I can't think of all of them.
TV Shows: I actually don't watch TV.
Books: Broken Harts: The Life and Death of Owen Hart by Martha Hart
Music: I listen to a lot of '80s. My faves are Culture Club (and yes, that means I like Boy George's solo work too), a-ha, Depeche Mode, Yazoo, Information Society, New Order, The Cure, A Flock of Seagulls, Real Life, Johnny Hates Jazz, Mr. Mister, Oingo Boingo. Then outside of '80s music I like Massive Ego, $uicideboy$, Linkin Park, and Fort Minor.
Games: Sonic the Hedgehog (1, 2, 3), Sonic & Knuckles, Sonic 3D Blast, Pokemon, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, GTA series, Hitman series, WWE series, Tomb Raider (original games series), Crash Bandicoot 1 & 2, Legacy of Kain series
Comics/Anime/Misc: Not really into much comics or anime, but my fave anime is Death Note.

At Trump's Pentagon, it's America last

March 19th, 2026 03:00 pm
[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

The quagmire President Donald Trump started in Iran is growing as the nation chokes off a critical oil transport route and continues retaliatory strikes on oil and gas facilities in the Middle East—the consequences of which are spiking fuel prices across the globe.

With no off-ramp in sight, Trump's Pentagon is now seeking over $200 billion—yes, with a B—to fund the conflict, according to The Washington Post.

Asked on Thursday about the request, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth didn’t deny the figure.

“As far as $200 billion, I think that number could move. Obviously, it takes money to kill bad guys. So we're going back to Congress and our folks there to ensure that we're properly funded for what's been done, for what we may have to do in the future, ensure that our ammunition is everything's refilled, and not just refilled, but above and beyond,” Hegseth said at a news conference. 

The shamelessness of the Trump administration to ask for $200 billion for war while it also argues that the United States cannot bear the expense of extending health care subsidies is stomach-churning.

The first six days of the war alone cost roughly $11.3 billion—about a third of what it would have cost to extend the Affordable Care Act subsidies that Trump and the Republican Party let expire. To Republicans, a war that is exacerbating Americans’ cost-of-living crisis is more important than making health care more affordable. So much for “America First.”

Of course, there is no way Democrats would vote to support a $200 billion request to fund a war that Trump never sought congressional approval for, nor provided a coherent reasoning for why it was necessary in the first place. That means it's unlikely a supplemental funding bill for the conflict could pass through regular channels.

Republicans would instead have to rely on budget reconciliation—a congressional procedure that allows the Senate to advance legislation with a simple majority rather than the 60-vote filibuster threshold.

A thick plume of smoke rises from an oil storage facility hit by a U.S.-Israeli strike late Saturday in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)
A thick plume of smoke rises from an Iranian oil storage facility hit by a U.S.-Israeli strike on March 8.

But budget reconciliation comes with strings attached, and it would likely mean that Republicans would need to find $200 billion in offsets to fund the war request. And such a hefty price tag would likely require painful cuts to social safety net programs, forcing Republicans to make an unpopular vote in an election year, all to fund an unpopular war.

You know what we call that? Political suicide.

Of course, at this point, the war is such a mess that talking about it in solely political terms feels wrong.

At least 13 American soldiers have died in the war so far, and more than 200 have been injured. Hundreds of civilians across the Middle East have also been killed in attacks related to the war. That includes the over 170, most of them children, whom the U.S. killed in an airstrike on an elementary school.

Meanwhile, gas prices are up 95 cents per gallon on average from a month ago, according to data from AAA. Patrick De Haan, an pricing expert with GasBuddy, said the speed of the gas price increase is setting records.

Not only is that a significant amount for millions of Americans who live paycheck to paycheck, but it could also have serious downstream effects on the economy if consumers have to cut back on other spending to afford gas.

This is a mess of Trump's making, and with each passing day, it's harder to see how we get out of it unscathed.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Republican lawmakers love to run on a promise to serve only a handful of terms, railing on members of Congress who serve too long and saying that limiting the number of years members can spend on Capitol Hill would solve what ails the federal government.

But just as much as Republicans love to extoll the virtues of term limits and make pledges about their own tenure, those same GOP lawmakers often go on to break those promises when their self-imposed timelines come to an end.

South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott became the latest Republican to break their pledge, announcing on Wednesday that he will run in 2028 for a third term, despite a past promise to serve only two.

“And I’ll say without any question that as I think about my own reelection in 2028, I think about all the lessons I’ve learned on the campaign trail for all these other candidates, and frankly, even in South Carolina,” Scott told The Post and Courier, adding that he plans to run again in two years.

That's an about-face from his comments ahead of his 2022 reelection bid, when he told the same South Carolina newspaper, “I plan to run for reelection, but that will be my last one, if I run."

Scott joins a long list of Senate Republicans who once ran on a promise of a self-imposed term limit but later broke those commitments after getting drunk on power.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) speaks with reporters as she arrives for a Senate Republican Conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol on the 38th day of a government shutdown, Nov. 7, 2025. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images)
Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, shown in November.

Sen. Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, might be the worst offender.

In 1996, when she first ran for Senate, she vowed to stay for only two terms. 

Thirty years later, Collins is now running for a sixth term, hoping she can overcome a blue wave in a blue-leaning state so she can continue to be "concerned" about her own party's actions but do nothing to actually stop them.

But wait, there's more!

Conspiratorial lunatic and Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson also said he would serve only two terms when he first ran in 2010. But he broke that pledge in 2022, when he ran for and unfortunately won a third term. And he's not ruling out running for a fourth when he's up again in 2028.

“So I learned in my second run, when I absolutely meant second and final, you can’t say, you know, never, never," Johnson said last May, adding that he doesn't think he wants to run again but won't rule out the possibility of changing his mind. "I don’t want to.”

Then there's the real hypocrites like the odious Sen. Ted Cruz.

In 2017, during his first term, the Texas Republican submitted legislation to limit senators to two terms. It didn’t pass, so he reintroduced that legislation in 2024—as he ran for a third term.

UNITED STATES - APRIL 23: Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is seen in the U.S. Capitol before the Senate passed procedural votes on the House passed foreign aid package on Tuesday, April 23, 2024. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images)
Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, shown in 2024.

“Term limits are critical to fixing what’s wrong with Washington, D.C.,” Cruz wrote in a 2023 statement. “The Founding Fathers envisioned a government of citizen legislators who would serve for a few years and return home, not a government run by a small group of special interests and lifelong, permanently entrenched politicians who prey upon the brokenness of Washington to govern in a manner that is totally unaccountable to the American people.”

If he truly believed that, Cruz would’ve hung it up in 2024.

Other Republicans who have broken term-limit pledges include Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin, who is now hoping to overcome his anger-management issues to win confirmation as President Donald Trump's head of the Department of Homeland Security. Republican Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska and a number of House Republicans have also broken their pledges.

Of course, term limits are not a great idea. They would likely make outside influence in Congress even worse than it currently is, since without institutional memory, members would rely even more on lobbyist knowledge. 

But it’s the principle here. If you say you’re going to serve only a certain number of terms, you should be held to that. 

Rules for thee but not for me: It’s the Republican Party way.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

On March 19, 2003, after weeks of false claims about Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s supposed stockpile of weapons of mass destruction, then-President George W. Bush launched his war in Iraq.

Following the initial air campaign, Bush addressed the nation about the neoconservative invasion known as “Operation Iraqi Freedom.”

“I want Americans and all the world to know that coalition forces will make every effort to spare innocent civilians from harm,” Bush said. “A campaign on the harsh terrain of a nation as large as California could be longer and more difficult than some predict.”

The war in Iraq dragged on for nearly nine years, with the last U.S. troops withdrawing in December 2011, during then-President Barack Obama’s first term. During the war, roughly 4,500 American troops and more than 100,000 Iraqis were killed. The war cost the U.S. around $800 billion.

Philosopher George Santayana famously said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”—an aphorism that has been repeated so often it risks sounding hollow. But there is nothing hollow about the death and destruction brought on by those who refuse to pay heed to the lessons of history.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

The numbers offer the most detailed look at how many pregnant, postpartum and nursing people have been caught up in the immigration enforcement surge, despite federal policy discouraging the practice.

By Shefali Luthra for The 19th


U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has detained and deported hundreds of pregnant, postpartum and nursing immigrants since the start of the Trump administration, the Department of Homeland Security confirmed for the first time Wednesday. Federal policy says that such individuals should only be detained in limited circumstances.

Between January 1, 2025, and February 16, 2026, 363 pregnant, postpartum and nursing immigrants were deported, DHS reported in response to questions submitted last fall by Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat. Sixteen miscarriages were recorded during that time period. In total, 498 pregnant, postpartum and nursing people were reported as “booked out” of ICE detention in that timespan, meaning that they were detained and then left ICE facilities.

As of February 16, 121 people who were actively detained were pregnant, postpartum or nursing, according to DHS. Of those, nine were in their third trimester of pregnancy.


Related | ICE keeps detaining pregnant immigrants—against federal policy


These numbers are the most detailed glimpse the Trump administration has provided into how its sweeping immigration crackdown has affected pregnant, postpartum and nursing people in particular. Dating back to at least fall 2019, DHS reported this information twice a year to Congress. Those reports stopped in 2025.

Previous reports show that ICE reportedly booked 347 pregnant, postpartum or nursing people in 2023 and 375 in 2022; most of those people were released or paroled, not deported.

Detention facilities have come under scrutiny from lawyers, medical professionals and immigrant rights activists, who say that many provide inadequate health care — particularly for pregnant, postpartum and nursing people, who are at heightened medical risk.

“We must ensure all pregnant women in custody are treated humanely and with respect,” Murray said in a statement. “I will continue to fight against the gross mistreatment of pregnant women in immigration detention.”

DHS has said that pregnant people make up a tiny minority of people detained — .18 percent of all detainees as of February 16 — and that they receive excellent health care while in ICE facilities.

“In the limited circumstances in which detention is necessary and appropriate, ICE monitors aliens known to be pregnant, postpartum, or nursing detained in ICE custody for general health and well-being, including regular custody and medical reevaluation, to ensure appropriate pre- and/or post-natal and other medical and mental health care,” the DHS report says.

Cartoon by Clay Bennett

Multiple nursing women have told The 19th that they were not provided breastpumps when detained. One, Nayra Guzmán, said she was not given a bed to sleep on even as she recovered from a Cesarean section.  Pregnant women and their attorneys have said they received limited prenatal care while in detention — which is vital for monitoring complications and treating them early — or even follow-up for complications. One, Amanda Isabel Fanego Cardoso, said she was diagnosed with preeclampsia and gestational diabetes after being released. Another, Cecil Elvir-Quinonez, said that though she began bleeding while in detention, she was not taken to see a doctor.

Already, DHS has drawn scrutiny regarding the health care detained people receive. ICE reported 31 detainee deaths last year — more than over the entire Biden administration, and the highest number in more than 20 years. So far this year, at least 11 detainees have died. None of these people were pregnant, postpartum or nursing.

Most people died after experiencing medical complications, including one man whose family attributed his death to an infection he contracted after developing an untreated toothache.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

-> It's the INNER HIVE DRIVE! Join Tom the Dancing Bug's Inner Hive today, and the cost of signing up will be donated to the Democracy Defenders Fund to sue Donald Trump over and over, and protect voters' rights! Get exclusive comics and content every week, support Tom the Dancing Bug…  and save America!

-> Sign up for the free weekly newsletter, The Tom the Dancing Bug Review! Not nearly as good as joining the Inner Hive, but it's free!

-> Get yer Tom the Dancing Bug books!  The Complete Tom the Dancing Bug Library — get one, two or all eight volumes.

-> Follow @RubenBolling on Bluesky and/or Mastodon and/or Threads and/or Facebook and/or Instagram and/or Reddit.


Related | Perhaps it’s time to regulate gambling on wars and elections


rogueslayer452: (Dune. Chani Kynes.)
[personal profile] rogueslayer452
++ We finally got the teaser trailer for Dune Messiah (yes, it's titled Dune: Part Three, but it's adapting Dune Messiah instead of part of the first book like the first two movies and therefore I will call it as such). First, this music in this trailer is phenomenal, just like with the previous trailers for these films it really demonstrates the grand scale of how epic this story is. Secondly, even just seeing little bits has me very, very stoked, especially the mentioning of Ghanima and Leto II's names. I may have some nitpicks with Denis Villeneuve's creative choices here and there throughout these movies, but it doesn't lessen my excitement to see this one. If he manages to get this right, the reactions to it are going to be very interesting, indeed.

++ Felicia Day will crowdfund for a movie spin-off of her webseries, The Guild.

Again, a pleasantly unexpected surprise announcement that totally caught me off guard! The Guild remains one of my favorite first ever webseries that I watched, and I even have the DVDs that were later made available to purchase because I adored it so much. I know that there was a musical stage reading that was done of The Guild with Felicia recently, so naturally this would be the next step. I hope the crowdfunding will be successful so she can make this happen.

++ Girl From Nowhere is a Thai mystery thriller drama that I've recently gotten into. It's an anthology centering around a mysterious girl named Nanno who transfers to different private schools each episode to expose the lies and misdeeds of the students and faculty. It's utterly fascinating. Nanno, who is quickly revealed to the audience as a mysterious immortal entity, is delightfully unhinged, even more so in the second season, and I like that the acts of revenge are done as a way for characters to experience karma of their wrongdoings. Although the drama premiered in 2018 and has two seasons, Girl From Nowhere: The Reset just recently premiered as a re-imagined reboot of the franchise, theorized to be set in an alternate universe with another girl as Nanno, this time played by Becky Armstrong (known mostly from being paired with Freen Sarocha in various Thai GL dramas). I have only just discovered this drama franchise, so I like both actresses who play Nanno. In general, this drama is dark and twisted, but in a fascinating way that I do so enjoy.

femslash/fandom/book recs

March 19th, 2026 08:09 pm
isabrella: Towa Bird in the music video for Gentleman (Default)
[personal profile] isabrella posting in [community profile] addme_fandom
Name: izzy
Age group:
20s
Country:
NZ
Subscription/Access Policy:
whatever! don't like, don't read.

Main Fandoms:
Willow (the 2022 TV show), currently rewatching Buffy and loving it (especially Faith my beloved), Deadloch (can't wait for tomorrow!!!), We Are Lady Parts, North of North... basically anything with a strong woman-heavy cast and a bit of humour. I love Dan and Phil, they're my dudes, but I'm not especially a shipper. Deeply obsessed with Little Mix, Renee Rapp and Towa Bird at the moment too... 
Fannish Interests:
I write fic - a lot of RPF, a lot of femslash!, I like reading meta (and being right... of course), I vid a little, I'm really interested in fandom archiving work and getting involved in fandom-first sites like Dreamwidth, Fanlore, and smaller archives. I call myself a fan of fandom itself!

I like to post about: Things I'm reading/writing/watching. I'd love book/tv recs for sapphic/woman-heavy sci-fi, fantasy, romance, mystery, etc. Maybe my in-progress romance novel & the writing process! Pop music/culture (don't forget I liked Chappell Roan before she was cool).
About Me/Other Info:
 To quote an incredibly dated yet formative show for me, Faking It (2014): the best way to get to know me is to understand the things I hate. These include: 
  • Genre fiction that gives lip service to queer politics but is ultimately politically conservative or regressive,
  • Everything that's going on with the proliferation of pull-to-publish fanfiction. Respect your roots!
  • Being anti-RPF but still caring about celebrities/not knowing the meaning of the word parasocial but still throwing it around,
  • The general hellscape of late stage capitalism and the panopticon,
  • Taylor Swift.

angrybubbles introduction

March 18th, 2026 10:21 pm
angrybubbles: A face of the character Madeleine Eparvier from AMC's Interview with the Vampire. She is turned to the right, looking off-screen, and there are bloody scratches on her cheek. (belonging)
[personal profile] angrybubbles posting in [community profile] addme_fandom
Name: I go by angrybubbles, or Mr. Bubbles online :)
Pronouns: I use any and all
Age group: Late 20s
Country: USA
Subscription/Access Policy: 18+ only please! My journal is primarily public, but I will hide Meta or Analysis I'm shy about in access-only entries.
Other Info: I'm a college student, and media analysis is my hobby. Since I'm a Vampire Chronicles person, you'll probably see discussions of dubcon, grooming, incest, and abuse on my page, so please approach carefully. I do have a Harry Potter ship in my OTP's, but I'm not touching the series again until that woman is safely dead.

Main Fandom: AMC's Interview with the Vampire
Other Fandoms: Mob Psycho 100, Mushishi, Fullmetal Alchemist (any media), Dandadan, Kuroshitsuji, 
Fannish Interests: I write fanfic, draw fanart (occasionally), but I primarily post analysis or short stories. Lots of Gothic Horror around these parts.
OTPs and Ships: Daniel Molloy/Armand, Armand/Louis de Pointe du Lac, Marius de Romanus/Armand, Claudia de Pointe du Lac/Madeleine Eparvier, Elizabeth Midford/Ciel Phantomhive, Harry Potter/Tom Riddle|Voldemort, Bakugou Katsuki/Midoriya Izuku, 

Favourite Movies: Basically every Ghibli Film ever, Speed Racer, and Talk Radio.
TV Shows: AMC's Interview with the Vampire, AMC's The Talamasca, Fellow Travelers, The Haunting of Bly Manor.
Books: The Daevabad Trilogy, Sha Po Lang (Stars of Chaos), Heaven Official's Blessing (Tian Guan Ci Fu), Little Thieves, The Nevernight Trilogy, The Illuminae Files, Dark Rise, The First Sister series (Linden A Lewis), The Dandelion Dynasty, and Viscious (V.E.Schwab).
Music: I listen to a lot of OST's: currently obsessed with Mushishi's OST, and Iron Lung's OST. Otherwise, I listen to Pop Punk and Rock.
Games: I don't really play video games, much. I grew up playing Diablo, and have put 200+ hours into Diablo 3.
Comics/Anime/Misc: Not a comic-book person, but I'm definitely an anime freak. The ones listed above, but also Hunter x Hunter, Psycho Pass, The Ranking of Kings, Soul Eater, Yuri on Ice, Sailor Moon, Dungeon Meshi, Boku no Hero Academia, Card Captor Sakura, Princess TuTu, Katekyo Hitman Reborn, Fairy Tail, Hyouka, Detective Conan, Fate/Stay Night and Madoka Magica. I'm sure there's plenty of others, too, but I haven't had time to sit down and watch a new anime in a while (Dandadan is the exception to this).
fancyflautist: (Editor 3)
[personal profile] fancyflautist posting in [community profile] su_herald
Jenny: Pretty flimsy excuse for coming by to see me.
Giles: You should have heard the ones I threw out. I just, I wanted to, uh... see how you were doing.
Jenny: I'm doing pretty good, actually. I've stayed out of mortal danger for three whole weeks. I could get used to it.

~~Ted~~




[Drabbles & Short Fiction]


[Chaptered Fiction]

  • AO3 Logo
    • Put Me Down, Chapter 27 (Buffy/Faith, E) by Inspectorrr
    • Bound by the calling, Chapter 10 (Buffy/Faith, E) by vampireslayerr
    • A Hundred Years of Spike, Chapter 36 (Buffy/Spike, M) by voidslayerworks98
    • Blood and Hunger, Chapter 3 (Crossover with The Walking Dead, E) by Celticwitch70
    • The End Is Now, Chapter 16 (Buffy/Giles, E) by KatyAmberAuthor
    • Welcome To The Hellmouth, Chapter 18 (Crossover with Supernatural, M) by Lalla527
    • Painting Over Scars, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Giles, E) by noctola
  • EF Logo
    • Gonna Lose the Chains, Baby?, Chapter 17 (Buffy/Spike, NC-17) by RealtaCorcra
    • I Know You By Your Heart, Chapter 17 (Buffy/Spike, R) by scratchmeout
    • Being Earnest, Chapter 4 (Buffy/Spike, R) by Tikiriaaa
    • In the Dark, Chapter 13 (Buffy/Spike, AO) by NotYourGrave
    • Slayer in Hell, Chapter 3 (Crossover with Hazbin Hotel, NC-17) by DeamonQueen
    • 10 Things I Hate About Riley Finn, Chapter 16 (Buffy/Spike, R) by Kazfox
    • Two Faced, Chapter 13 (Buffy/Spike, R) by LeoTheLion
  • Sunnydale After Dark Logo
    • squared, Chapter 11 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by jewelram
    • the whole kit and caboodle, Chapter 8 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by jewelram
    • Villainess, Chapter 17 (Buffy/Spike, R) by ClowniestLivEver
    • Boomerang, Chapter 15 (Buffy/Spike, R) by Gabby
    • Idiosyncratic Use of Advanced Dimensional Folding as Mediated Through an Organic System, Chapter 13 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by zinjadu
    • Home Sweet Home, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by Lilacsandorangeblossoms
    • Short and Spuffy 26, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by Sarahvampgrl
    • A Glimpse in the Night, Chapter 4 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by Sarahvampgrl
    • Phlegmatic, Chapter 10 (Buffy/Spike, R) by Girlytek
    • Short and Spuffy, a collection, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by Sirabella
    • Captive Audience, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, NC-17) by Grief Counseling
    • A Series of Unfortunate Spins, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by VeroNyxK84
    • In friendlyh recompense, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, R) by LadyInQuest
    • Betty and the Bleached, Chapter 16 (Buffy/Spike, NC-17) by Dusty
    • Dearest Gentle Slayer, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, NC-17) by LadyInQuest
    • Riding Shotgun on the Hunt, Chapter 18 (Buffy/Spike, PG-13) by VeroNyxK84

[Images, Audio & Video]


[Reviews & Recaps]


[Fandom Discussions]


[Articles, Interviews, and Other News]


Submit a link to be included in the newsletter!

Join the editor team :)

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

College Republicans of America, a network of right-wing clubs with more than 280 chapters, recently named Kai Schwemmer the new political director. 

Schwemmer will play a vital role in directing the organization, which has contributed to the GOP’s leadership and ideology pipeline. And his new role has additional significance because, as a devotee of neo-Nazi podcaster Nick Fuentes, it hints at the future of an increasingly bigoted Republican Party.

The GOP’s affiliation with antisemitism and racism is nothing new. The party has been knee-deep in bigoted politics since at least the 1960s—and since President Donald Trump became the party’s leader in 2016, the right has more openly embraced this kind of hate.

FILE - Nick Fuentes, far-right activist, holds a rally at the Lansing Capitol, in Lansing, Mich., Nov. 11, 2020. Former President Donald Trump had dinner Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2022, at his Mar-a-Lago club with the rapper formerly known as Kanye West, who is now known as Ye, as well as Nick Fuentes, who has used his online platform to spew antisemitic and white supremacist rhetoric.
Far-right activist Nick Fuentes holds a rally in Michigan on Nov. 11, 2020.

In addition to this news from College Republicans, GOP candidates have been seeking out Fuentes for his blessing. For instance, Florida gubernatorial candidate James Fishback—who has been dogged by reports of sexual misconduct—has Fuentes’ support in his campaign.

Fuentes’ involvement in national politics goes back to the infamous 2017 “Unite the Right” neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, which featured prominent chants of “Jews will not replace us” and eventually led to the killing of counter-protester Heather Heyer. Fuentes was among the crowd that Trump referred to as “very fine people.”

He’s also the host of a white nationalist podcast—whose devoted followers call themselves “groypers”—where he advocates for extreme right-wing politics, stemming from his desire to make the United States a white nation where nonwhite immigrants are removed. 

Fuentes is a promoter of antisemitic conspiracy theories, including the false allegation that the Holocaust is a hoax.


Related | How racist group chats are part of a long history of GOP bigotry


On his podcast, Fuentes has discussed his admiration for Adolf Hitler, who he said was “cool,” argued that women should be imprisoned, expressed his desire for an American dictatorship, and spoken out in support of pedophilia—including saying that he wanted a “16-year-old wife.”

Because of his extremist views, Fuentes has already been a public headache for top Republicans. In 2022, he was a dinner guest at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property—along with fellow antisemite Kanye West—generating worldwide headlines. 

After he was criticized by Fuentes for being a part of an interracial marriage, Vice President JD Vance said that Fuentes “can eat shit.”

Cartoon by Pedro Molina
A cartoon by Pedro Molina.

But Fuentes, who backed Trump’s presidential campaigns, has also criticized his policies, expressing anger at Trump’s war on Iran and arguing that it breaks from the so-called “America First” ideology. 

He’s also complained that Trump hasn’t deported enough people, saying, “I’m criticizing Trump because there’s not enough deportations, there’s not enough ICE brutality, there’s not enough National Guard.”

“My problem with Trump isn’t that he’s Hitler—my problem with Trump is that he is not Hitler,” Fuentes said.

The influence that media personalities have over the GOP cannot be underemphasized. 

For decades, Republicans marched in lockstep with racist radio host Rush Limbaugh, who hosted leaders like former President George W. Bush on his show. And two Republican presidents, Ronald Reagan and Trump, rose to prominence in the party after careers in media.

Overall, Fuentes’ toxic, extreme worldview has not been a hindrance—he’s the future of a party that just continues to be more and more hateful.

glowingfish: (Default)
[personal profile] glowingfish
Got up, read a bit, walked along the beach, came home, stared at my email. I have about an hour to get up and go to the Dollar Tree before it gets dark.
And uh, I had other things to say.
chazzbanner: (red car)
[personal profile] chazzbanner
Bizarre weather continues: A foot of snow over the weekend. Yesterday I wore my bug puffy winter coat, today it was 45F/7.2C. Much melting.

I went to the drugstore (bone meds pickup) in late morning, and after lunch went to [livejournal.com profile] ordenchaz's place - got gas on the way. Bit of a flurry when I accidentally left my phone there (it fell out of my purse), oh well, when I went back we got a chance to chat some more. :-)

Oddities:

I should have said.. the 1930s robbery alluded to yesterday was in my home town. It was startling to see its name in the book I'm reading.

I've probably mentioned before that sometimes when I say something with a certain rhythm and perhaps a change in pitch it will remind me of a song, so I'll repeat the words, singing them. (I know if at least four other people that do this, too!) Today I said "I'll put it up there" with a rise on the last word. Instantly laughed and it to a bit from The Wizard of Oz. It's right after the guardsman says "the wizard says "'go away!'"

go away!

It's three seconds into the clip.

Yesterday I was looking at the entries I wrote on the Malta/Italy trip, and I came across this. It made me laugh. :-) It's from Siracusa, Sicily.

"I managed to get to my hotel room last night, but.. it was quite funny. I got to a point where I wasn't sure which direction to go and I was just fed up (this didn't take me long!). I ran into a little lotto shop and said Dov'é via Tripoli!?

"Excited burst by four or five Italians, gesturing. I turned to the closest, a woman, and said wryly, diretto, eh? ('straight ahead') She said Inglese? We all inglese here! Then a man who actually had no English ran into the street with me and pointed a tall building (counting the stories to show what he meant) and gestured that it was on one side. I said destra? and he said yes."

(well, sì)

-
[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

The State Department just added 12 more countries to its newish and very racist visa bond program, where people from countries Donald Trump doesn’t like have to pay huge amounts of money to come here, even for business or tourism. 

That’s a $15,000 bond, to be precise. Travelers get the money back if they don’t overstay their visa, but that means they’re out that money for their entire trip. 

A Customs and Border Protection officer checks the passport of a non-resident visitor to the United States inside immigration control at McCarran International Airport, Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2011, in Las Vegas.   The U.S. Travel Association is pushing Congress to make it easier for foreigners to visit the United States. Nearly 7.6 million nonimmigrant visas were issued in 2001, compared to fewer than 6.5 million in 2010. Tourism leaders in the United States say the decline symbolizes a diplomacy failure that is costing American businesses $859 billion in untapped revenue. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)
A Customs and Border Protection officer checks the passport of a non-resident visitor to the United States inside immigration control at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas.

These 12 countries join the 38 countries that were already targeted, most of which are in Africa. And the bond requirement goes into effect in just two weeks. 

The 12 new countries are Cambodia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Grenada, Lesotho, Mauritius, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nicaragua, ​Papua New Guinea, Seychelles, and Tunisia. 

Already on this racist list: Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Botswana, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Central ⁠African ​Republic, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Djibouti, Dominica, Fiji, Gabon, ​The Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Mauritania, Namibia, Nepal, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Tajikistan, Tanzania, ​Togo, Tonga, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

Ostensibly, this bond requirement is necessary because people from these countries have high overstay rates on B1 business and B2 tourism visas, so a hefty bond ensures they leave on time. So, if anyone from those 50 countries is coming here for work or for a vacation or really any sort of short-term visit, they have to pay that bond. 

To be fair, people from those 50 countries may not all have to pay the full $15,000, because the amount is arbitrarily determined by a consular officer based on their review of things like income, skills, and education. Then, the officer can set the bond at $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000 based on vibes. 

In theory, people could get a bond from a bond company, where you pay only part of the amount, and the company issues the full bond. But those sorts of companies only issue bonds in very narrow circumstances, and it’s in no way clear whether there are bond companies aplenty in these countries willing and able to issue these fiscal guarantees. 


Related | Trump team keeps finding new ways to turn the world against the US


It was inevitable that the bond requirements would apply mostly to African and Central/Latin American countries, because most European countries and several Southeast Asian countries are on the Visa Waiver Program list. If you’re coming to the U.S. from one of those countries, you don’t need a visa at all if your visit is under 90 days. So, those folks pay no bonds, and their overstay rates aren’t met with the same fervor DHS applies to majority non-white countries.

The Trump administration has been building up to this for a while now. Back in August, officials announced a “pilot program” and began requiring a $5,000 bond for people coming from Malawi and Zambia. But it’s been hugely expanded since then. 

Fun fact: People must pay the bond at the time of their interview, not when the visa is issued, and paying the bond doesn’t guarantee they will get a visa. That also means that if someone’s consular interview is well before their planned trip here, they are out thousands of dollars for months. 

Cartoon by Mike Luckovich

Additional fun fact: If someone is on a B1 or B2 visa and then tries to claim asylum or change their immigration status in any way, the government gets to keep the bond. 

It’s absolutely absurd to do this a couple of months before the World Cup in June, where Côte d'Ivoire, Algeria, and Cabo Verde are all set to play matches in the United States. Fans who are coming here to support those countries now have to figure out how to pay this bond. 

And then there’s Trump’s travel ban, which is also going to block World Cup visitors from coming to see their teams compete. That covers 20 countries on top of these 50 to which the bond requirement applies.  

U.S. tourism is already cratering because people are afraid to come here thanks to Trump’s brutal immigration crackdown. That’s a huge economic hit for the country, which the administration apparently determined was not enough of a hit—so they decided to make it even harder for international visitors to get here. 

This only adds to what is already obvious: The World Cup is going to be a fiasco and people are going to stay home, hurting the bottom line of all the host cities. And those folks who decide to take the risk and come here face the prospect of arbitrary detention by ICE, which is presumably possible even if they coughed up that giant bond. 

If only we could move every U.S. World Cup match to Mexico.


Related | Here's why the World Cup should ditch US for Mexico


[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Vice President JD Vance is urging voters to “double down” on President Donald Trump and his policies that have driven up costs, strained our global alliances, and begun a new war in the Middle East. 

On Wednesday, during a post-speech Q&A in Michigan, Vance was asked about soaring gas prices and what, if anything, the Trump administration plans to do to address them.

“This is a temporary blip, okay?” Vance said, adding that skyrocketing gas prices due to the Iran war are “not going to last forever.”

“We're going to take care of business. We're going to come back home, and when that happens, you're going to see energy prices come back down to reality,” he added.

The U.S. has just experienced the second-largest four-week increase in gas prices since 1990, according to an analysis from The New York Times. 

During his response, Vance called out high prices under former President Joe Biden, but he elided the distinction between those prices—which were largely caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and which Biden successfully brought down by the end of his term—and the current crisis, which President Donald Trump opted into when he kicked off his ill-conceived war against Iran.

At the same time, just how soon we will “come back home,” as Vance claims, remains to be seen. Even less certain is how soon any sense of stability will be brought to a region we have successfully destabilized.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who is sort of the Sen. Susan Collins of the judiciary these days—you know, all brow-furrowing concern but no action and almost always capitulating to Trump—issued his firmest “Don’t harass judges, pretty please?” statement to date. 

But it still sucks.

After well over a year of President Donald Trump 2.0, his administration, and his minions attacking and openly threatening judges who rule against him, Roberts roused himself from his torpor to say … nothing much. 

“It’s important that our decisions are subjected to scrutiny, and they are,” he said. “The problem sometimes is that the criticism can move from a focus on legal analysis to personalities.”

Roberts also criticized “personally directed hostility,” but then completely wussed out when it came to saying who, exactly, is making all these threats. Maintaining his commitment to never saying anything negative about Trump, he made sure to both-sides things and say that attacks were coming from “not just any one political perspective.”

Except that’s not true. And the chief justice of the highest court in the land knows it.


Related | Bad times make for busy judges


It wasn’t a Democrat who went on a late-night social media tirade to say that the Supreme Court was “hurting our country and will continue to do so” because they ruled against Trump on tariffs. 

It wasn’t a Democrat who said, “Our Country was unnecessarily RANSACKED by the United States Supreme Court.” That would be Trump as well. 

It wasn’t an elected Democrat who demanded that U.S. District Judge John Bates be impeached or called him a “predator” because he didn’t like a ruling requiring restoration of some public health websites the Trump administration had taken down. That would be Trump fanboy and GOP Rep. Andy Ogles. 

It isn’t an elected Democrat who created a “WANTED” poster featuring judges who have ruled against Trump. That would be Ogles as well. 

Clay Bennett/Tribune Content Agency

And, of course, there aren’t any Democrats in the Trump administration, so it’s only people like White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller saying that judges ruling against Trump are committing an “ongoing legal insurrection,” whatever that means. After the tariffs ruling, Miller said “We are living under a judicial tyranny” and whined that the “judicial coup is out of control.”

After ruling against Trump on his patently unconstitutional executive order nullifying birthright citizenship, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour was swatted and got a bomb threat. It’s pretty safe to say those anonymous efforts didn’t come from liberals, but rather from the violent minions Trump constantly incites. 

And finally, while no one is sure who burned down the home of South Carolina Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein, it happened not long after she blocked the Trump administration from getting that state’s voter data. 

To be blunt, Roberts’ current statement is really no stronger than what he said as attacks accelerated against Judge James Boasberg last year. 

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”


Related | These Supreme Court justices want you to just shut up already


What John Roberts refuses to acknowledge is that John Roberts—and his fellow conservatives on the court—created this problem. They kneecapped the lower courts by preventing them from issuing nationwide injunctions because that was making Trump sad. And they keep overturning lower court decisions without explanation to hand victories to Trump. 

Roberts unleashed this when he wrote the majority opinion giving Trump unprecedented immunity from pretty much everything. Pretending he doesn’t understand that ruling emboldened Trump, and that it protects him from fallout even for calling for violence against the very court Roberts heads, is ridiculous. 

The chief justice is at fault and he knows it—but he won’t admit it. Instead, he’ll pop up every few months with some vague statement decrying attacks against judges, never naming names, never offering a solution. 

Weak sauce, man. 

[ SECRET POST #7012 ]

March 18th, 2026 05:40 pm
case: (Default)
[personal profile] case posting in [community profile] fandomsecrets

⌈ Secret Post #7012 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.


More! )


Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1001.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

President Donald Trump is revisiting his tried-and-true grab for a “51st state”—this time, he has his sights on Venezuela. 

“Wow! Venezuela defeated Italy tonight, 4-2, in the WBC (Baseball!) Semifinal,” he posted via Truth Social. “They are looking really great. Good things are happening to Venezuela lately! I wonder what this magic is all about? STATEHOOD, #51, ANYONE?”

Trump’s grand idea was prompted by the South American country’s first-ever win of the World  Baseball Classic Tuesday evening. 

FILE - Venezuela's Vice President Delcy Rodriguez takes part in talks with the Russian Foreign Minister during in Moscow, March 1, 2019. (AP Photo/Pavel Golovkin, File)
Venezuela sitting President Delcy Rodriguez

This sports win is a big deal for Venezuela. Enough so that sitting President Delcy Rodriguez deemed Wednesday a public holiday, giving nonessential workers the day off. And they needed a reason to celebrate. Right now, the South American country is undergoing plenty of political change and tension at the hands of the U.S. after Trump greenlit a military operation on Jan. 3, to capture former leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. 

Many, including Trump himself, have said that Rodriguez and the rest of the Chavista government—a term to describe the ruling party that follows a semblance of ideas brought about by former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez—are under the thumb of the Trump administration until another election is carried out. Meanwhile, that hasn’t stopped Trump from reestablishing the sale of oil from Venezuela. 

But Trump has been inadvertently pursuing his 51st state, or “Donroe Doctrine,” as his grip on Latin America grows and his quest to expand continues. 

Outside of Venezuela, the president has threatened to invade Colombia while puffing his chest at Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel.

“I do believe I’ll be … having the honor of taking Cuba,” Trump said to reporters Monday. “Whether I free it, take it—I think I could do anything I want with it. You want to know the truth, they’re a very weakened nation right now.”

The island country has recently faced extreme power blackouts, with hospitals losing electricity and people taking to the streets as the U.S. threatens tariffs against countries who supply them with oil. 

But more cooperative countries, like El Salvador and Costa Rica, are, or were, allowing the Trump administration to send non-native immigrants to their prisons. 

The desire to get entangled in regime changes from Venezuela to Cuba challenges Trump's “America First” approach on the campaign trail that helped land him his second term. And, in part, it seems to be impacting his once steady Latino vote in the U.S. 

So, while the president jokes about making Greenland and Canada, and now Venezuela, the 51st state (53rd?), his actions tell a larger story of  America’s planned control of the Western hemisphere.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe testified before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Wednesday, where Democratic Sens. Mark Kelly of Arizona and Jon Ossoff of Georgia were relentless regarding the consequences of President Donald Trump’s ill-conceived war in Iran.

Kelly began by asking whether China and Russia are “our primary geopolitical rivals,” a point the two officials affirmed. He then laid out the fallout of Trump’s war: soaring gas prices and a policy shift that lifted sanctions on Russia, syphoning billions to President Vladimir Putin that he can use against Ukraine.

Kelly then pressed further, probing what Trump knew—or failed to understand—about Iran’s capacity to retaliate by creating chaos in the Strait of Hormuz. 

“I'm having a hard time finding out whether the White House asked or whether there was a brief, whether the president knew,” he said. “Did he know this was going to happen, or did he just disregard it?” 

Ossoff was far less friendly in his approach, challenging Gabbard on the administration’s claims that Iran posed an "imminent nuclear threat” just months after claiming that its nuclear facilities had been “obliterated.”

“Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an ‘imminent nuclear threat’ posed by the Iranian regime?” Ossoff asked. 

“The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president,” Gabbard responded. 

“False,” Ossoff shot back. “This is the worldwide threats hearing where you present to Congress national intelligence—timely, objective, and independent of political considerations.”

As with everything in the Trump administration, Gabbard and Ratcliffe’s hearing was yet another display of lies and incompetence.

Trump's DOJ is still in disarray

March 18th, 2026 06:30 pm
[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Fam, is it good when a federal judge invents an entirely new rule just for you? Not really!

James Boasberg, the chief judge of the federal district courts in Washington, has ordered that judges in his district be notified every time a grand jury declines to indict—or no-bill—a case brought by the laughably bad U.S. Attorney for Washington Jeanine Pirro. 

Fam, is it good when your office has had more no-bills in one year than most offices get … ever? Nope!

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro speaks during a news conference on charges related to the deadly shooting of Israeli Embassy staff during a news conference at the Attorney General's office for the District of Columbia in Washington, Thursday, Aug. 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
U.S. Attorney for Washington Jeanine Pirro

Boasberg’s rule applies whenever Pirro’s office tries to indict someone via grand jury and fails, so her office has to tell the magistrate judge on duty—even if she ultimately decides not to charge the defendant at all.

In sort of a belt-and-suspenders move—because honestly, who trusts the Department of Justice these days—the rule also requires the grand jury foreperson to “promptly, and in writing” report the grand jury’s lack of concurrence to the duty magistrate.

This comes on the heels of Pirro’s failed attempt to indict six Democratic lawmakers for the crime of telling servicemembers they have a duty to refuse illegal or unconstitutional orders—which is not actually a crime, so you see the problem with landing an indictment. 

Impressively, not a single grand juror voted to indict, and Pirro dropped the case shortly after.

Judges in the district have also not been very fond of Pirro’s little trick of charging people in complete violation of the Fourth Amendment, locking them up, and then quietly dropping the charges. 

As far as her office is concerned, that’s no harm, no foul. But in the meantime, people are named in criminal indictments and sometimes jailed until Pirro deigns to drop her unprovable, unwinnable cases. 

Fam, is it good when a judge thinks your office hasn’t met the lowest bar possible in your attempt to criminally charge someone? Not a chance!

FILE - U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, stands for a portrait at E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, March 16, 2023. (Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via AP, File)
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg

Boasberg is the same judge who quashed the DOJ’s subpoenas of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. This almost never happens, as prosecutors have a good bit of discretion in issuing subpoenas—and because it’s a very early stage in a criminal case. 

Nonetheless, Boasberg found that there was “abundant evidence that the subpoenas’ dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the president or to resign and make way for a Fed chair who will.” 

Oh, and also that “the government has offered no evidence whatsoever that Powell committed any crime other than displeasing the president.”

Pirro’s office has already filed a motion asking Boasberg to reconsider the decision, whining that she would appeal to a higher court. 

Go for it, Jeanine. 

Pirro is handling this setback in her usual way: with a flailing attack on the judiciary. According to her, by not letting her office prosecute someone who has not committed a crime, Boasberg “bathed Jerome Powell in immunity.” 


Related | Why is this disgraced Trump lawyer still creeping around?


First, Powell has no immunity whatsoever. Pirro’s office can issue new subpoenas anytime it wants, as long as it has information that shows that Powell may have committed a crime—an actual crime. 

Second, a complaint about immunity is pretty rich coming from someone who works for the only person who the courts have actually bathed in immunity.

Mr. Bathed in Immunity himself, President Donald Trump, is—predictably—unhappy and demanded that Boasberg be removed from all administration cases and “suffer serious disciplinary action.”

Sorry, buddy, but it’s not an ethical violation to rule against you. 

lk021226dAPR.jpg
A cartoon by Mike Luckovich.

Speaking of subpoenas, it’s Attorney General Pam Bondi’s turn to go before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on April 14 to address her office’s mishandling of the Epstein files. 

A DOJ spokesperson already issued a statement saying that the subpoena is “completely unnecessary” because lawmakers can view the unredacted files, which “the attorney general has always made herself available to speak directly with members of Congress.”

Agreeing to chat with friendly Republicans is not the same as testifying under oath, sorry. 

The DOJ hasn’t said whether Bondi will appear, but good luck with that—the committee went to the mat to force the Clintons to testify. 

So good luck, Pam Bondi! Can’t wait to see the transcript from that hearing someday.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Oklahoma Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin's confirmation hearing to be President Donald Trump's new homeland security secretary quickly went off the rails when a top Republican laced into Mullin over his past conduct.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chair Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican in charge of Mullin’s confirmation hearing, asked him to explain his recent comment suggesting that Paul deserved the violent assault he suffered in 2017 at the hands of a neighbor.

“I was shocked that you would justify and celebrate this violent assault that caused me so much pain and my family so much pain,” Paul said. “I just wonder if someone who applauds violence against their political opponents is the right person to lead an agency that has struggled to accept limits to the proper use of force.”

"Tell it to my face,” Paul continued in his opening statement at Wednesday's confirmation hearing. “Tell the world why you believe I deserved to be assaulted from behind, have six ribs broken and a damaged lung. Tell me to my face why you think I deserved it. And while you’re at it, explain to the American public why they should trust a man with anger issues to set the proper example for ICE and Border Patrol agents."

Mullin, however, refused to simply apologize.

"I'm not apologizing for pointing out your character," Mullin said.

Paul also played clips of other instances in which Mullin threatened people with violence, including at a Senate hearing where Mullin challenged a witness to fight him in the committee room.

Trump, for his part, nominated Mullin to replace Kristi Noem, whom he fired earlier in March. Her firing was not because of her grifting, ineptitude, and abject cruelty, but instead because she placed blame for her agency's obscene spending on Trump.

Republican senators—who are now worried that Trump's violent immigration enforcement will hurt the party in the midterms—hope a new face at DHS will help soften their image and quell a possible revolt from Latino voters this fall.

Yet, as Paul's line of questioning pointed out, Mullin is just as cruel and violent as Noem.

Like Noem, he excused the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who killed two American citizens in Minneapolis. 

What’s more, Mullin may even be as corrupt as Noem. His wealth has soared since he took office through stock trades.  

Ultimately, Mullin has proven to be equally as subservient to Trump and defensive of his illegal demands as Noem was. Hopes that Mullin could turn DHS's image around look very much misplaced.

At the end of the day, the cruelty is the point for Trump, and Mullin will happily work to achieve that goal.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Illinois Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton won the Senate Democratic primary in that state on Tuesday night, making her the favorite for the seat currently held by retiring Sen. Dick Durbin. Stratton was strongly backed by Gov. JB Pritzker, and her win will help him to make a case for a possible presidential run in the 2028 election.

Stratton was the underdog in her race but earlier in the year it was revealed that Pritzker had donated $5 million to the super PAC supporting her in the race. Pritzker also appeared alongside Stratton in a campaign ad released in February with a montage of citizens saying “fuck Trump.”

Stratton has called for ICE to be abolished and has positioned herself in direct opposition to many of Trump’s policies and rhetoric. By contrast, her rival in the primary, Raja Krishnamoorthi, received money from a group of pro-MAGA donors.

In the last two years, Pritzker has emerged as one of the most prominent voices countering Trump. Pritzker attracted national attention after Trump ordered federal agents to go to the state to carry out his unpopular mass deportation anti-immigrant agenda. Pritzker labeled the show of force an “invasion” and used the state’s legal team to fight the Trump administration.

Governor JB Pritzker talks to media at a news conference in Chicago, Monday, Oct. 6, 2025. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker

Pritzker also referred to Trump as a “wannabe dictator” and summed up his defense of his home state by noting, “If you come for my people, you come through me. So come and get me.”

Helping Stratton to win her race is a demonstration of political organizing that will give Pritzker a concrete example to point to if he chooses to run for the presidency.

Currently there appear to be a significant number of Democrats who seem likely to be 2028 presidential candidates, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, among others. Powering the victory of a fellow Democrat, as Pritzker has for Stratton, will help him to stand out in the crowd.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

The morning after Texas Sen. John Cornyn and state Attorney General Ken Paxton advanced to a runoff for the state’s Republican Senate nomination, President Donald Trump pledged to step in and save his party from an ugly and prolonged battle that could jeopardize the seat for the GOP in this November’s general election.

But Tuesday night was the deadline for candidates in Texas to formally end their campaigns and remove their names from the May 26 runoff ballot.

And given that Trump has so far not made good on his vow to coronate the GOP nominee, both Cornyn and Paxton remain in the race and will both appear as options for Republican primary voters in the runoff.

That news should be music to Democrats' ears. Cornyn and Paxton are now expected to continue spending millions to gore each other as they fight to be the nominee. And whoever emerges victorious from the runoff will do so damaged by friendly fire, leaving them weaker going into the general election against Democratic nominee James Talarico.

Talarico’s devout Christian faith and populist messaging could be uniquely appealing to a Texas electorate that hasn't voted a Democrat into a federal or statewide office since 1994.

What's more, while initial reports said Trump planned to endorse Cornyn, Trump has since raised doubts about whether he will endorse in the race at all. 

FILE - This photo combination shows Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, left, in Dallas and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, in Austin, Texas, both on March 3, 2026. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, Jack Myer)
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, left, and Texas Sen. John Cornyn are vying for the Republican Party’s nomination for a Senate seat.

That is especially damaging for Cornyn as he struggles to consolidate the support of MAGA Republicans who view him as an establishment squish. The “America first” crowd instead prefers Paxton—despite his laundry list of scandals—as he has been a steadfast backer of Trump and the GOP’s culture-war battles. 

On Saturday, Trump told NBC News that he'd be making a decision "over the next week or so," but he added that his decision will have "to do with the SAVE America Act," referring to a voter-suppression bill that currently has little chance of passage in Congress.

Cornyn tried to appease Trump and grovel for his endorsement, saying he'd vote to nix the filibuster in order to get the legislation passed, despite the fact that he was previously a loud defender of the Senate procedure that allows the minority party to block legislation if it cannot obtain 60 votes.

But even that didn’t seem to be enough for Trump, who is hell-bent on signing the SAVE Act into law, even though even Republicans say it wouldn’t help the GOP in the midterms and may actually be a net negative.

Trump said that he “very much appreciate[s]” that Cornyn said he’d nix the filibuster to get the SAVE America Act passed. But when NBC News asked if that was enough to earn Trump’s support, Trump replied, “I don’t know, but we have to get it passed.”

Even worse for Cornyn is that Trump seemed skeptical of arguments that Cornyn is the more electable candidate and thus should get Trump's blessing—the main argument Cornyn had to get Trump’s backing.

“I’ve heard that,” Trump said of the Cornyn electability argument. “I don’t know. I don’t know that to be a fact.”

The runoff, meanwhile, has been as ugly as Democrats could have hoped for.

Both Cornyn and Paxton have gone nuclear on each other with negative ads.

Cornyn has highlighted Paxton’s previous indictment and impeachment as well as the extramarital affairs he’s allegedly had. 

And Paxton released an ad showing Cornyn’s past criticism of Trump—something unlikely to sit well with Texas GOP primary voters.

Ultimately, a recent public poll shows Talarico with leads over both Paxton and Cornyn. (That said, the poll was conducted by a Democratic group, so it should be taken with a grain of salt.)

All of this has Republicans sweating and fearing that the Senate seat could slip away from them if the 2026 midterm elections prove as bad for the GOP as current evidence suggests.

As Dr. Ishirō Serizawa said in 2014’s “Godzilla,” “Let them fight.”

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

If the prediction markets were betting they would have a good week, they were wrong. 

First, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed criminal charges against betting platform Kalshi—20 counts, to be precise. It’s illegal to bet on elections in Arizona, but Kalshi lets people bet on elections everywhere, thanks to the Trump administration dropping Biden-era attempts to block just that. 

FILE - Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes speaks at the Arizona State Prison, March 19, 2025, in Florence, Ariz. (AP Photo/Darryl Webb, File)
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.

It’s also illegal to run a sports betting business in Arizona without a license, but according to the criminal complaint, Kalshi let Arizona residents bet on sports anyway.

Kalshi knew this was coming, as the Arizona gaming department sent them a cease-and-desist in December, so it preemptively sued the AG and the Department of Gaming last week to try to get a ruling that they can ignore the laws, basically. Kalshi has also sued Iowa, Utah, and Ohio to try to force those states to let them do whatever they want as well.

In another development that is probably suboptimal for Kalshi and its competitor Polymarket, Democrats have introduced a bill to try to regulate this runaway nightmare that lets people bet on wars.

Sen. Chris Murphy’s bill would ban prediction markets from allowing someone to bet on any government action if they have inside information. It would also ban all betting on acts of terror, assassinations, and wars.


Related | What could possibly go wrong with betting on wars?


Honestly, that’s kind of weak sauce, but it is at least a start. There’s no question the Connecticut Democrat sees this only as a first step and wants to take it further. 

“For my part, this bill doesn’t cover the waterfront in terms of what is concerning in these markets,” Murphy said. “But this seems to be the most urgent problem right now because there is such obvious, deep corruption happening inside the White House.”

That corrupt White House has no real interest in imposing any regulations on these things. Instead, the Trump administration is planning to force every state to allow prediction markets by pretending it isn’t gambling. That would mean that any state laws regulating or banning gaming would essentially be nullified. 

The Polymarket prediction market website is seen on a computer screen, Sunday, Jan. 11, 2026, in New York. (AP Photo/Wyatte Grantham-Philips)
The Polymarket prediction market website is seen on a computer screen, on Jan. 11 in New York.

The two leading companies, Kalshi and Polymarket, have another not-so-secret weapon: Donald Trump Jr., who is a paid adviser to Kalshi and an unpaid adviser and investor in Polymarket. It really highlights how much Junior is just there to lobby his daddy, because otherwise the two market leaders—which are huge competitors—would likely not employ the same adviser. 

Incapable of passing up an opportunity to be corrupt, the Trump family business is going to start its own prediction market as well. 

Meanwhile, in the most gruesome and bleak lawsuit imaginable, a bunch of people have sued Kalshi in a class action lawsuit over bets on the death of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. 

After some people who clearly had inside information won big on “predicting” Khamenei’s death, Kalshi roused itself to say that you can’t bet on death—just war, and whether a leader will be “out.”

So Kalshi said it wouldn’t pay out on bets on Khamenei and refunded everyone their original bets plus any fees. These gamblers … er, “investors,” are mad that there is a “death carveout” and they want to be properly rewarded for betting on death. 

Imagine being the kind of ghoul who would put your name on this lawsuit. Especially in light of the fact that most people—even Republicans—want to see much of this sort of thing banned.

A functioning government would be responsive to this overwhelming sentiment and regulate or ban these markets, but we don’t have a functioning government. Instead, we have a corrupt monstrosity that’s going to force these markets on everyone, all while President Donald Trump and his family profit. 

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

Richard Grenell is causing quite a stir following his exit from his role at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. The former president of the cultural center—which President Donald Trump has renamed the Trump-Kennedy Center—was replaced Monday with a Biden-era facilities chief, Matt Floca. 

“There was a story he got fired; he didn’t get fired,” Trump said Monday to reporters. “He was here for a short period of time, for a year, figuring it out with Matt and everybody else. And Matt now is going to take over.”

But in the wake of his new position change, Grenell isn’t bidding adieu gracefully. Instead, it seems, the special envoy to the president is using his social media to attack anyone asking questions.  

“Elizabeth Williamson isn’t a journalist. She is a left wing hack who lies about Republicans. All the time,” he posted on X Monday alongside a screenshot of their text conversation.

According to the screenshots, New York Times journalist Williamson asked Grenell for comment on his “next venture” now that he’s out of the job. "Any general comment on what has proven a turbulent year for you in the administration?” she asked.

Responding, Grenell wrote, "Here's my on the record comment. 'You are such a left wing hack who is not interested in the truth, but interested in attacking Republicans and manipulating the news for your own far left agenda. Anyone looking at your body of work realizes that you've just got an agenda that includes anything against conservatives.'"

x

On Saturday, he also lashed out against Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, who has been looking into the Kennedy Center’s finances, and accused Grenell of putting the institution “out of business.”

x

It’s not unheard of for Grenell to have a catty moment with reporters, using colorful language to communicate. But the entire Trump administration, in addition to the president, has garnered a reputation for treating reporters cruelly in the past year. 

While at the helm of the Kennedy Center Grenell was known as someone who operates with a cold shoulder and, according to employees, as if he didn’t want to be there

On the bright side, Trump’s new pick for Grenell’s replacement won’t have much work to do outside of overseeing a closed performing arts center. This week, the Kennedy Center board voted to close the structure for Trump’s proposed two year-long renovations. 

Daily Kos reached out to Grenell for comment but did not hear back at time of publication.

[syndicated profile] dailykos_feed

As countries scramble to secure oil, gas and fertilizer, China’s bets on clean energy and coal are cushioning its dependence on oil and gas imports.

By Nicholas Kusnetz and Georgina Gustin for Inside Climate News

When Gary Dirks arrived in China in 1995, the country’s government was looking to source more of its energy at home. Dirks was the incoming country head for BP, but efforts to find more oil and gas in the country had largely fizzled.

So government leaders pivoted, Dirks said. China invested heavily in its domestic coal and, later, in building wind and solar energy. Now, those investments and other steps are shielding China from more severe impacts of the volatility unleashed by the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran, despite Beijing’s continued reliance on foreign oil.

“They’ve been taking measures for a very long time to try to maximize their use of their own resources,” said Dirks, now senior director at the Global Futures Laboratory at Arizona State University. “They’ve been aware of this vulnerability for a very long time.”

By some measures, China could appear to be highly exposed to the price spikes and supply disruptions the war has sparked in global oil and gas markets. The country gets nearly half of its oil and one-third of its liquefied natural gas, or LNG, from the Middle East, according to an analysis of data by Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy.


Related | Gashole: Trump says high fuel costs are good, actually


Yet China has built up a crude oil stockpile of nearly 1.4 billion barrels, meaning the country could be cut off from imports for months, “and they’d be OK,” said Erica Downs, a senior research scholar at the Center on Global Energy Policy.

China is more vulnerable with natural gas, for which it doesn’t have such a substantial stockpile, experts say. Because the war has caused prices in Asia to spike, some industrial users in China, like chemical or glass plants, will need to pay more, cut back their operations or both.

“There is definitely going to be short-term pain,” Downs said. “But I think in the longer term there are definitely some silver linings for China.”

In an essay in Foreign Policy written with Jason Bordoff, the founding director of the Center on Global Energy Policy, Downs argued that while the war has exposed China’s dependence on Middle Eastern oil, “it also underscores how deliberately Beijing has sought to prepare for a world in which energy security is inseparable from geopolitics—by electrifying its economy, securing domestic sources of energy, amassing stockpiles, and dominating clean technology supply chains.”

Last year more than half of new cars sold in China were electric, according to the energy think tank Ember, while the country is a leader in electrifying heavy-duty vehicles and high-speed rail, too. Meanwhile, a rapidly growing portion of its electricity is being generated by solar and wind energy as China installs more of those technologies than the rest of the world combined.

Gasoline and diesel demand have already begun to fall, despite rapid economic growth, while China’s total crude demand has plateaued, according to the International Energy Agency.


Related | The Trump administration’s concerted attacks on wind threaten the industry’s future


China has also retrofitted many of its coal plants to operate as flexible power sources, like natural gas turbines that can be turned on and off more easily than traditional coal plants, said Kate Logan, director of the China Climate Hub and Climate Diplomacy at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

“That set up China quite well in terms of any potential shocks to its power sector because China can ramp up coal usage,” Logan said.

Beyond the power sector, China could also use coal to produce liquid fuels and feedstocks to replace oil or gas in industrial processes or for chemical production. Any increased coal use could lead to a surge in greenhouse gas emissions.

“That’s something to keep an eye on in terms of the near-term impact on emissions,” Logan said.

Downs, at Columbia, said she expects any spike in coal use would be short-lived because of the country’s larger goals of reducing air pollution and climate emissions.

In its recently published 15th Five-Year Plan, the Chinese government said it planned to cut its carbon intensity 17 percent by 2030. That’s a slight decrease in ambition from the previous plan, and the program also renewed the possibility of a new gas pipeline from Russia’s Siberia region. The Iran war could prompt more urgent discussions between the countries, Logan said.

“I’d imagine this is something, again, that would bring China closer to Russia for both oil and gas imports,” Logan said.

The chokepoint at the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial passageway for commercial shipping effectively blocked by the Iran war, is also affecting global fertilizer shipments, potentially imperiling the spring planting season across much of the world. Roughly one-third of the global seaborne fertilizer shipments go through the strait, a statistic that has panicked agricultural producers.

But China has attempted to protect itself from fertilizer disruptions, too. While the country imports sulfur, a critical fertilizer ingredient, from the Gulf, it has otherwise become largely self-sufficient.

Fred Gale, a former U.S. Department of Agriculture economist and China specialist, explained that China is a net exporter for nitrogen fertilizer, which is made using natural gas.

In February, weeks before the U.S. attack on Iran, Chinese authorities “issued a document ordering companies and rail transport to ensure fertilizer supplies and build up reserves ahead of spring planting,” Gale explained.

“For now China seems to be feeling pretty smug about the fertilizer situation,” Gale noted.

A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington said the government has called for an immediate halt to military operations in the region to prevent the conflict from spreading.

“The Strait of Hormuz and waters nearby are an important route for international goods and energy trade. Keeping the region safe and stable serves the common interests of the international community,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “China will do what is necessary to protect its energy security.” The spokesperson added, “We will continue to strengthen communication with relevant parties, including parties to the conflict, and play a constructive role for deescalation and restoration of peace.”

Cartoon by Clay Jones

Perhaps the greatest benefit to China, Downs said, could come from overseas. As the country has pushed to electrify and generate more of its energy from renewable sources, Chinese companies have become global leaders in these technologies. Already, nations around the globe have been turning to Chinese firms to import or build solar panels, EVs and batteries. Now, Downs argues, price shocks from the Iran war could accelerate this trend.

Dirks said the war is a reminder that governments still see oil as a geopolitical weapon.

“Any nation today that imports hydrocarbons has to be aware of that,” Dirks said. “And I think now that wind and solar in particular have come down dramatically in price, more and more countries will be asking themselves, ‘What is the balance of risk in using wind and solar and battery resources as opposed to importing oil and gas?’”

Whether at home or abroad, many experts say, the war-induced shock to fossil fuel markets reinforces China’s energy policies.

“The big takeaway,” Logan said, “is that this really vindicates a lot of China’s clean energy push.”

Profile

lunadelcorvo: (Default)
: : : L u n a d e l C o r v o : : :

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Page Summary

Miscellanea

InboxIcons
Customize

Things I need to remember:
• Asking for help is not, as it turns out, fatal.
• Laughing is easier than pulling your hair out, and doesn't have the unfortunate side effect of making you look like a plague victim.
• Even the biggest tasks can be defeated if taken a bit at a time.
• I can write a paper the night before it's due, but the results are not all they could be.
• Be thorough, but focused.
• Trust yourself.
• Honesty, always.

Historians are the Cassandras of the Humanities

Tags