: : : L u n a d e l C o r v o : : : (
lunadelcorvo) wrote2010-03-18 10:26 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
OK, now I have officially seen the Worst Thing Ever.
http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/slavery/southern_slavery_as_it_was.htm
This is a Christian Slavery Apologetic. No, really. This article is a diatribe about how slavery in the south wasn't all bad, only the parts that were not in conformity with 'biblical slavery,' and 'biblical slavery' is OK, and fine and good because the Bible says so.
I quote:
Read the article - I can't begin to relate how mind-boggling it is. The level of mental contortion required to actually advance such a position is... well, it's bloody insane.
This is a Christian Slavery Apologetic. No, really. This article is a diatribe about how slavery in the south wasn't all bad, only the parts that were not in conformity with 'biblical slavery,' and 'biblical slavery' is OK, and fine and good because the Bible says so.
I quote:
"Provided he owns them in conformity to Christ's laws for such situations, the Bible is clear that Christians may own slaves."And
"Today if an abortionist sought membership at either of our churches, he would be refused unless he repented and abandoned his murderous practice. But if our churches had existed in the ante bellum South, and a godly slave owner sought membership, we could not refuse him without seeking to be holier than Christ. Such a desire would be wicked, and this wickedness was at the heart of the abolitionist dogma."This nutjob claims that Southern slave owners vigorously opposed the slave trade as 'wicked,' but evinced no hypocrisy by owning slaves. After all, they were doing the poor slaves a favor by taking them into Christian homes...
"The slave trade was an abomination. The Bible condemns it, and all who believe the Bible are bound to do the same. Owning slaves is not an abomination. The Bible does not condemn it, and those who believe the Bible are bound to refrain in the same way. But if we were to look in history for Christians who reflected this biblical balance — i.e. a hatred of the slave trade and an acceptance of slavery in itself under certain conditions — we will find ourselves looking at the ante bellum South."I mean, wow. Seriously?
Read the article - I can't begin to relate how mind-boggling it is. The level of mental contortion required to actually advance such a position is... well, it's bloody insane.
no subject
All it takes is faith.
no subject
no subject
I don't know if these people are misguide, or stupid, or just doing it for the shock value, but like, really...I can't believe them.
no subject
I think the 'liberal' (for lack of a better term, maybe 'sane' or 'rational' might serve) tendency to dismiss extremist positions like this one has given those positions an awful lot of freedom to grow and spread outside the public eye. And I also think this is something on which those advancing such positions rely - knowing full well no one on this side of the sanity line will take them seriously.
no subject
no subject
To make it relevant, we are forced to either interpret, cherry-pick and selectively ignore bits an pieces of it, or else we end up stuck with outrageous positions like this one.
no subject
What the fucking fuck?
no subject
no subject
That's beyond crazy.
The optimist exults that we are created in God's image.
The pessimist fears that this is true.
no subject
(P.S. Love the icon!)
no subject
no subject
And there you have the Right Wing/Neo-Con/Fundie/Dominionist/Millenial philosophy summed up quite eloquently. "We have to live by Biblical morality, and not interpret it in any way, except for those parts we really don't like."
I'm not sure which are worse, the cherry-pickers, or the ones who *really* do want to follow all of it....
no subject
no subject
Sometimes, people scare me. Sometimes they scare me a lot. Life in the Netherlands is looking really good right about now.... LOL